Comparative Analysis of Linear and Nonlinear Dimension Reduction Techniques on Mass Cytometry Data


Journal article


A. Konstorum, Nathan Jekel, Emily Vidal, R. Laubenbacher
bioRxiv, 2018

Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Konstorum, A., Jekel, N., Vidal, E., & Laubenbacher, R. (2018). Comparative Analysis of Linear and Nonlinear Dimension Reduction Techniques on Mass Cytometry Data. BioRxiv.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Konstorum, A., Nathan Jekel, Emily Vidal, and R. Laubenbacher. “Comparative Analysis of Linear and Nonlinear Dimension Reduction Techniques on Mass Cytometry Data.” bioRxiv (2018).


MLA   Click to copy
Konstorum, A., et al. “Comparative Analysis of Linear and Nonlinear Dimension Reduction Techniques on Mass Cytometry Data.” BioRxiv, 2018.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{a2018a,
  title = {Comparative Analysis of Linear and Nonlinear Dimension Reduction Techniques on Mass Cytometry Data},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {bioRxiv},
  author = {Konstorum, A. and Jekel, Nathan and Vidal, Emily and Laubenbacher, R.}
}

Abstract

Mass cytometry, also known as CyTOF, is a newly developed technology for quantification and classification of immune cells that can allow for analysis of over three dozen protein markers per cell. The high dimensional data that is generated requires innovative methods for analysis and visualization. We conducted a comparative analysis of four dimension reduction techniques – principal component analysis (PCA), isometric feature mapping (Isomap), t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), and Diffusion Maps by implementing them on benchmark mass cytometry data sets. We compare the results of these reductions using computation time, residual variance, a newly developed comparison metric we term neighborhood proportion error (NPE), and two-dimensional visualizations. We find that t-SNE and Diffusion Maps are the two most effective methods for preserving relationships of interest among cells and providing informative visualizations. In low dimensional embeddings, t-SNE exhibits well-defined phenotypic clustering. Additionally, Diffusion Maps can represent cell differentiation pathways with long projections along each diffusion component. We thus recommend a complementary approach using t-SNE and Diffusion Maps in order to extract diverse and informative cell relationship information in a two-dimensional setting from CyTOF data.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in